
A big deal in Buddhism is the repetition of certain mantras/chants. I believe it is a fairly common thing among normal Buddhists to repeat a particular mantra 1000 times per day. Repetition is also the idea behind the prayer wheels, which for every revolution that you induce sends up the prayer written on the wheel, and possibly more depending on how many prayers are written on paper stored within the wheel. At Boudha, for example, there are 108 prayer wheels encompassing the stupa and many people will spin each one on their go round. At maybe 10 revolutions per spin, that’s 1080 prayers or more. I think this is different than the 1000 I mentioned before though, which need to be vocalized.

As an aside, I find being in an alien culture a very rich time for reflection on common biblical ideas and texts because it sets them in a different light and lets me see them in relation to different things an illumines previously unrecognized significance.
Given all this repetition, I ask myself, what does the Bible say about repetition, especially in the context of devotional practices? Jesus said “Do not heap up empty phrases as the Gentiles do, for they think that they will be heard for their many words.” Many words doesn’t seem to necessarily be repetition, but it could be and either way I think it applies.
If one is thinking “I want to do more. I want to make sure I am justified and nothing I have done is held against me,” one has two options. One is to think of the best thing to do. That is, to maximize the quality of what you do. Say the best prayer, do the best activity, sacrifice the best thing, etc. This could be done maybe, but it is extremely open-ended. What is best? A more emotionally certain way of going to the devotional extreme is to look to quantity. I may not be sure what is best to do, but I can be certain that doing anything a 1000 times is better than doing it 999 times.
A potential objection a Buddhist might make is that repetition is commanded a lot in the Old Testament. Sacrifices are to be repeated. Once per year, once per week, etc.
But I respond that this is not repetition in the same sense. This “repetition” is like the repetition of the Lord’s Supper, which is for the purpose of reminder and remembrance, not multiplication of power of effectiveness (though Roman Catholics might disagree). The “repetition” commanded in the OT is to compensate for man’s forgetfulness, not because more accrues to man for every time a particular thing is done. It seems to me that the Buddhist way of thinking about repetition tends to shift meaning from the intention and will of the doer to the thing done. In other words, repetition within a very short time span, one right after the other, tends to place importance on the thing done as if it has power of itself. And if that is true, if the mantra uttered has power of itself, it is perfectly reasonable to think that that power can be increased through multiplication.
But this is the definition of superstition. Namely, to think that particular things or actions have spiritual power or significance of themselves. It is what mankind tends towards when they do not know of a Wise Heavenly Father that makes decisions adapted to our unique needs and states, and to whom we simply ask and submit to the answer He wills to give. Repetition attempts to place control and power in our own hands. This is the same reason Jesus gives for not needing to repeat prayers “And when you pray, do not heap up empty phrases as the Gentiles do, for they think that they will be heard for their many words. Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.”
However, I think there is a danger in throwing the baby out with the bathwater with regard to repetition, because some good things can be mistaken as repetition in the empty sense. Is a marathon runner who trains every day engaging in “repetition”? Is a stone carver who is carving a border on a building with a repeating design engaging in “repetitive activity?” Yes and no, obviously. But these repetitive tasks (maybe the word “regular” is better?) are done with an aim outside of themselves. They are to complete something—a race of some decoration. So maybe it is possible that a Buddhist chant in the same way? Can someone repeat a single sentence thousands of times per day without disengaging their minds and degrading the practice into one where the words themselves are presumed to have power and effect? Could they be repeating the mantra with the hope of more deeply grasping its meaning and letting that meaning change their heart and life? Could a Christian repeat the sentence “God has saved me” thousands of times per day to good effect? It seems strictly speaking that the answer depends on the person. It maybe could be done with good effect, but this kind of repetitive activity very easily leads to mental disengagement and superstition of the sort represented by solar-powers prayer wheels.




































































































